When processing retention release using the 'Retention Release' option (from the Subcontract Payment Authorisation Screen), all the invoice dates (entered/received/due) are overridden by the date of processing (i.e. 'today').
This means that retention release invoices are always paid late, because we can't see (nor extrapolate) the actual due date - even through BI reporting.
I maintain that this is a system bug, but Jobpac have categoried it as a feature suggestion. Hopefully this issue can be corrected in a future release.
A suggested work-around was to use the 'Progress claim that can also release retention' method (while only processing a retention amount and not a claim amount). But this seems contrary to the implied purpose of the 'Retention Release' function.
Company | Mosaic Property Group |
Job Title / Role | System Manager |
I need it... | Yesterday...Come on already |
Dear Viewpoint Suggestion Box contributor;
We at Viewpoint sincerely thank you for your contribution to Suggestion Box on how we can improve Viewpoint products. While we can’t do everything at once, we rely upon your feedback to help guide the prioritization of our product improvements, and Suggestion Box is a critical tool for us to understand and prioritize our customers’ needs.
Viewpoint reviews Suggestion Box regularly for all of our products and updates statuses, adds comments, and performs various house-keeping (including deleting) as needed to ensure that Suggestion Box is maintained as a productive environment for product enhancements requests.
© 2023 Trimble Inc. All Rights Reserved. Viewpoint®, Vista™, Spectrum®, ProContractor™, Jobpac Connect™, Viewpoint Team™, Viewpoint Analytics™, Viewpoint Field View™, Viewpoint Estimating™, Viewpoint For Projects™, Viewpoint HR Management™, Viewpoint Field Management™, Viewpoint Financial Controls™, Vista Field Service™, Spectrum Service Tech™, ViewpointOne™, ProjectSight® and Trimble Construction One™ are trademarks or registered trademarks of Trimble Inc. or its affiliates in the United States and other countries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
Hi there,
I'll Investigate this further and get back to you.
cheers
Andrew